Loss or lost are such terribly misleading words to use at such a time of grief and pain. Dreams are not lost when a baby dies - parents can dream for other children and have other hopes and dreams for future children.
I feel and believe (and know many others also who feel and believe the same) that continued use of the word loss implies an error the parents have made, or an implication that the child who has died, no matter what the gestational age, is not a real person, with feelings and thoughts, but merely a growth or a group of cells. Loss takes away the dignity and humanity of the child who has died and reduces the pregnancy to something medical and technical instead of human.
In this era of unfettered abortion and a throwaway society, why relegate children to an uncaring abyss?
An uncaring abyss?
An uncaring abyss?
An uncaring abyss?
All this hard work, all these hours, all these tears shed, only to have someone feel that I am relegating children to an uncaring abyss.
Furthermore, I disagree heartily that dreams cannot be lost. I believe I lost a dream or two along the way.
I do think there are better words than lost, but how to encompass all of the deaths, from conception through infancy, and all the ways it can happen, in one word? I, myself, am lost.
Tell me how you feel about this word. I agree that it is misleading, because our babies can't be found. But while I don't love the word, I feel as if it's become a pretty commonly used, and acceptable word in this community. I did check Websters, and there is a definition that applies.
But this is more about what we feel. Please respond. Are you offended?